#41 GPT-4.5, Figma Slots, Web Haptics, Qwen3.5, Anthropic DoW, Google Workspace CLI, Gemini 3.1

I like that look. It's a good look, but I need to keep it away cuz I'll Oh, yeah. Peter Piper pick Peter Piper picked a pepper. Does that sound all right? Yeah. Yeah, it's quite good. Yeah. Okay. Right. Well, we're live. Nice. Say hello to all your friends and family. Hello everyone. Hello everyone. What's up? You're back after your uh birthday absence. What did you do? Yeah. Yeah. Um well, I had some You said what what we did, right? Yeah. You asked. Yeah. Uh yeah, family came over and we had some great time in my garden and tomorrow I'm going out with a group of friends and so still going on. a week later. Now that's just greedy. Well, last week we couldn't manage everything in one day. So, of course, of course. Um, well, what do you what are you going to be doing tomorrow then? Uh, bowling. Bowling. Oh, nice. Yeah. Yeah. Is it like a uh what do you call it? Like a a themed bowling? Is it like uh I don't know like 80s or retro or something like that? No, I don't think so. Just you know some friends spending time. Standard bowling. Nice. Yeah. Nice. And dare I ask how old? Yeah. How old? 20 22. Yeah. 22. The big two. Yeah. Big two. Two ducks in a row. Quack quack. That's That's a bingo reference. That's how old I am. The the two threes actually. So two threes. God, that's a terrible year. Yeah. Absolutely terrible year. 33. Yeah. But still feeling 19. Do you know I'm I'm like doing like I'm stretching out. I've done it a couple of times this week stretching out and stuff like that and just my bones just start like popping and clicking. It's crazy. It's like what you Yeah. And I'll be like I just like what? Like what happened there? It's called aging. Yeah. Yeah. But hey ho. Heyi ho. Um so yeah. What have you been doing? I have, what have I been doing? I have been filming lots, as tends to be my life nowadays. Just filming videos all the freaking time. Um, which, by the way, I love because I I love actually trying out new things. I want to try and dedicate I probably said this on the show before. I want to try and dedicate Thursdays to like actually coding. And luckily yesterday I had a I had a sponsor that allowed me to just build an app. So I want to try and build an app every single week and that was my app for la uh well it'll be out next week but um yeah that will be my this week's version of building an app coincidentally with a sponsor but next week yeah I just want to keep keep building because it's just yeah I love making videos but I also love actually using these tools. I really want to be using them in like a team because it's all well and good me talking about doing this stuff. But um uh you know it's it it's very different when you're in a team and I think a lot of people on YouTube come out of this stuff from a perspective of working solo and it's yeah it's useful and a lot more people are working solo but I I'm craving a bit of team team action some gang banging you know do you know Uh yeah, I've been in building a lot alone as well. Yeah. To be like to the point that now I have an issue wrapping my head around how many apps I'm building at the same time. So I'm building an app that is helping me to wrap my head around the apps that I'm building. So this is Exxom Forge, a crazy name to to basically look at all my apps that I'm building and just have a have a constant overview of everything that I'm doing. Control center. It's a control center. Wow. Less control, more monitor. Mission. No, not mission control. Yeah, it is more monitor. Yeah, it is monitoring. Command center. Command AI center. Command. It is a command AI center. So, I'm just like looking at the directories, the folders that I have and I'm not really happy with how it is so far. But it's it's an it's an approach because in this new world that we are in, we're building so much. We are moving with it such a speed that I myself feel like I can't catch up. So, I'm trying to build environments and tools around the speed of AI so I can catch up. It's just so much. I think the issue is, and I sort of I've literally just had a video go out about this kind of thing, is we're in such a rush to kind of build tools. We're we're not starting with like solid um problem statements. like we're we're trying to play catchup. We're trying to build tools and trying to invent problems that we have. Oh, cute. Um yeah. Uh we're trying to invent problems and and I saw a meme that was like, you know, the amount of side projects we're all building now. Yeah. Is crazy. Like over actually doing real work. Like I saw one where all of these people were trying to climb up the wall of side projects and then another person was like curled up over on like actual client work or something like this. It's um but you know you can't um and I'm talking to my friend as well about the whole open claw thing and this and that and again like if you want to get involved in this sort of stuff just replace a problem that you already have you know don't try and look for problems and yeah this is what I'm trying to do like I'm seeing so many problems like everywhere because like I I do pay attention to detail details when I use something and then I'm like why can it do this then now I'm like well why why not building a tool to do it because if if I have this problem some like more people have this problem too that's one way of looking at it another way is why should I do it manually when I can spend you know 10 times more time automating it or making a tool for it but It's at the end of the day it's learning for me. This is a new space creating like web apps projects. This is new to me. So I'm spending time like doing exactly that and learning. Yeah. Yeah. this new tool that I built. I used um convex database from one of our viewers recommended that even though it's been on my mind for a while they you know they were like you should use convex and um I've used tanstack start before but I also built this project using tanstack start. Not that I give a crap or know at all about how it's uh how it's created or any of the code, but being able to work with a Tanstack project and work with a convex project and understand how it all kind of fits together is is the point. You know, this the the architectural decisions um are of importance. So, yeah. Um yeah, it's hard to get not to get sidetracked though. What I'm trying to do is things are going really well for me right now with the with the channel, with the YouTube channel, sponsorships and and such. Mostly sponsorships and viewership is growing as well. So, if you've, you know, come from watching my channel, thank you so much. But, um, things are working well and what I'm able to see is, uh, processes and things I have to do on a daily basis. So the thing the issue that I had before running a company or growing a company rather and and trying to trying to figure it all out is that you'll have one sales call a month, you know, maybe one sales call every three months. You'll be marketing one day. There's so much context switching that you never you never feel like you forget what you do. So you relearn, okay, what do I do on a sales call? What's the process? Join the sales call. Do a write up. Whatever it is, whatever your whatever, however you feel like you're you're you do, you just forget and you relearn. You forget and relearn because it happens so infrequently now because things are going quite well for me at the moment. I'm able to see like the same things I'm doing over and over again. So that's why I'm able to dive into a lot of these tools and I'm trying to systematize a lot as much as I possibly can with things like open claw. I spent the day in Claude co-work and claude desktop the other day to really understand well what can I do in claw or what do I need to do in claude co-work versus what can I get open claw to do. Um, and so I'm really enjoying I'm I'm I'm trying to solidify everything so that everything works really smoothly and then then I can improve, then I can like change things or I can add something else. Do you know what I mean? It's very easy to get shiny object syndrome and start working on something else. It's like no, no, no. Let's glue this down. Let's lay the foundations of what's working right now. Take this opportunity to make the most of it. make the most of this opportunity and and build systems that support what's going on right now. Does that make sense? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It totally does. Yeah. Um we have 29 people. So, should we uh should we Well, well, do you want to talk about Apple first? Actually, did you have your eye on anything from the Apple? I I had this in the intro, too. So, I could go to Apple. Yeah, let's do that then. Yeah. Cool. Okay. Before we start, if you're over on YouTube, give us a like, give us a retweet if you're on Twitter. Little heart, thanks for joining us from everywhere. Um, and scan this QR code wherever it is to join the YouTube where all our clips get released. We don't release them on YouTube, uh, Twitter, do we? So, uh, this week, Apple launched some new, uh, products. We'll be talking about those. OpenAI released CHIP not CHP GPT 5.4 before not codeex. Uh the naming I Yeah, they they suck at naming. Claude Code now has a voice mode. You can directly talk to it. Uh Proplexity launched computer, something similar to OpenClaw. You can have haptics on your websites now, which is really exciting. It's so cool. I cannot wait to show you this. It's just genuinely so fun. Uh and Figma launched slots uh something that was really missing and Web Flow is now rolling out component canvas yet another canvas uh view coming to web flow. Uh all of this in today's episode and more in today's episode. This is Command AI. I'm Kabarza and I am Sam and this is a week in AI design and dev. Cool. Awesome. So, let's start with Apple. Let me get to my screen and all right. So, something really cool about this Apple new website that it doesn't do it. The moment I want to show it, it doesn't do it. It doesn't do it anymore. Is this No, this is the homepage, right? Yes. But like the homepage had a had an animation. So, you would come to the homepage and there was an animation. Uh, a yeah, maybe just give me a second actually. Maybe a new private window or something. Maybe it can't run on the uh on the Neo, so they had to remove it. They realized that website can't run on it. No, I don't think so. Um, but I I have the the LinkedIn post that I can show in a second. Just Oh, I see. You recorded it, didn't you? I recorded it. Yeah, I I made a video. I I mean I post it everywhere, but LinkedIn is just handy right now for me to go and show it. Yeah. Okay. So, just to show you what I mean here, you would go to the homepage and there was this animation slid and I wanted to to show it and also talk about it. This is, you know, kind of like one of the nightmares when you do this layout shift type of animation. You are literally shifting every single bit of content on the website. Wonder how they did it. Oh, hello. Don't mind us. Yeah, show here. So, anyway, uh that animation doesn't exist anymore. Yeah, it doesn't. But the website is pretty sweet. It has a lot of like nice animations. I want to talk about the website and also the products. We have this new MacBook called Neo. And something funny going on here. People mentioned it on Twitter. You see how I can select this text but not really completely. They are masking the the t the text into this like font that is not a font. They are not uploading this as a font. this is an image but they are masking the actual text to this image. So it's or like the other way around. Um so so you have like a so so you have a custom font but it's not a font. It's just an image and it's still selectable because many people do this mistake. They just upload an image and it's not selectable. It's not readable for machines. It's terrible. Yeah, this is quite what is the what's the benefit of having an image that's been masked then? Is that is the background an image? Is it like is it comp? So they want they wanted to have this custom font, right? But they I I assume they didn't want to upload an entire like font family or like an entire font file just to have it here. So they just used an image. Um I haven't looked into the code too much here. U but as you see you can select it but it's not completely selectable. Uh this the same way. Um yeah uh here we see also gradient text image. Yeah. So this is a this is an image they are using there essentially. Now uh let's look at the rest of the website and also the product. It's the cheapest um Apple product that you can buy. Not Apple product with like with a display and with Mac OS. So this is like the entry point for people using Mac OS. That's why the this like MacBook Neo landing page is mostly about the Mac OS and less about the the actual laptop. Uh anyway, so they are showing the things that it can do, the shiny colors and this one is also another interesting part of this website. Um this sequence that we see here, it's not 3D. It's just a video that they are scrubbing on on scroll. When you scroll, they are playing the different. It's good to know that Apple do this. Yeah, they commit to video scrubbing because traditionally you have like an animated J PNG or something like that, right? They're just committing to a video. Yeah. And I think the video is um bringing like kind it's kind of like the balance between all um all of these solutions. Having it in 3D would be the best, but it would be really heavy. It will be very like perform costing a lot of performance not really worth it. A video is just good enough. The only downside is it's a bit laggy because you you have just so many frames to work with. Um but yeah uh you have actually more of that. So this is also another one that is just a view video that you can scrub and scroll and yeah they are showing the product. So the product this is a MacBook 13 in uh using an iPhone chip inside. M that's one of the most interesting things about it and that's how they are getting it to be so cheap um with 8 GB of RAM and people are you know uh a bit divided on that is 8 gigabytes enough for you know today usage I don't know depends on what you do I think for kids students my parents that would be enough you'll know because it will be reflect active on what you do on your phone, right? So, browsing, social media, media, well, content, Mac OS could take more, right? It could take more. More memory hungry. I I have no doubt the people who are even thinking about this are already overqualified for the the type of Exactly. So, if you know what 8 GB of RAM is, 8 gig being, oh, should I get 8 gig of RAM? It's like computer for you. But here's the interesting thing. So people rush to buy Mac Mini for Open Claw. This is exactly the same price. It doesn't bring the same performance, but then you have the question like, do you actually need the performance? Yeah. No. Yeah, you're right. It would be good because the thing is obviously a Mac Mini, you have to plug in a a monitor with it and all the rest of it. I'm sure people have some set up where they can whatever. But what did I watch? I watched something and they were just like, "Hang on, what? People are buying these [ __ ] M Mac minis and they're not even running any local LM or anything like that." And it's like it's just so ridiculous this whole Mac mini thing. Again, I think it's just normies getting into AI, not really understanding like they just they they just following whatever they're told and the person who just so happened to tell them is completely wrong about the usage. Anyway, uh I think this would be much better. Yeah, this has a screen, it has a keyboard. You could just Yeah. go over and seeing it from that perspective. It is much easier to have your agent to have its own computer with screen and everything. There was a head of security or something at Meta, I think some some girl which deleted all of our emails. Openclaw deleted all of our emails. Did you see this? Yes. And I think she had that running on a on a Mac Mini. Now, if you've got it running on a Mac Mini and it's doing that, like the frant like, you know, having to plug it in or whatever, you know, all that fuss, whereas you could just go open your screen and deal with it. Not that I mean, there's two there's two uh aspects to this saga. The point is it's it's hilarious that she's head of security or something like this. Some to that effect and it safety. So, AI safety. Yeah. The other one being funny. Other one being is a Mac Mini is adding a point of friction to something that actually could do with a nice little screen. Yeah. Yeah. But really, you do you do kind of just want it working away in the background. So, I don't know. I don't know. Um you you could also work alongside with it. Like in my experience, Open CL get um stuck in so many places. Um and if you have it just like you know just just help it to sign in somewhere. Yeah. Yeah, because I had issues with it uh trying to sign in in different platforms or like sign up. Yeah, this could help with that. And for student uh people also mentioning uh the absurdity of this specific picture. Oh yeah, there are two Apple products. They are the same price. Yeah, that's funny, isn't it? So this is for people just starting with the headphones. I mean that's an exaggeration, isn't it? I think the AirPods Max are 350. I don't know. And the laptop is $499 at its cheapest. So AirPods. I mean, look, we could talk about No, it's not. It is the same price. Oh my god. That's crazy. Yeah, it's the same price. That looks new. that that website. Um, look, you know, cute computer ain't really for us anyway. What are your thoughts on the Mac M5 Pro and M5 Max? All right, let's talk about the So, there is the MacBook Pro updated version with Pro and Max and the prices. Oh, so one thing that I noticed is availability. Not everything is available the way I feel like I could buy before. Like if you go with the 16 in um and let's say the nano display obviously. So here there is some weird thing going on with the memory. I feel like I can buy it with a pro chip at 24 GB, 48, 64, but I can't do 36. It's and it's kind of in between, right? It's not Yeah, I noticed that. I think it's just because they're they're locking because that's they're basically those two are trying to get you to upgrade to the max and the max does not come in I don't know whatever it is 45 gig memory you know. Yeah that that's it exactly. So the that that's a bit odd but I guess that's how the chip bending is turning out to be in in M5 Pro but and also the SSD is at two terabytes starting at two terabyte if you buy the max. So, if you buy the M5 Max chip and if you go with the lower CPU, lower GPU of the Max, uh, and even like 36 GB of RAM, I don't know who would want this. Like, why would you buy the max chip with 36 gig? It It's just doesn't it's it's just not enough. But how much are you talking to upgrade it to? What's the next step? 45. So if I go with this one. Okay. So this one. So we are at 4K for 36. Let's see how much it will be. We are 500 more for So 500. Yeah. A little bit of upgrade and then another 200 and another 800 on top of that because the thing is it's it's unified. So like 36 is fine for a lot of people, you know, if you're not graphics graphics stuff for I I would say for the pro it's enough, but like 36 GB for the M5 Max users, I feel like that's quite low. If you are buying the max version, I would say like 64 or 128 because you Why though? Because why? because they're different things like CPU is different from RAM which I understand like typically people who would need this level of graphic um like usage they would probably do I'm I'm I'm thinking about Blender and After Effects and like really heavy uh programs 36 GB of RAM is not enough for Uh I have 32 GB and I'm running out of my RAM constantly. Yeah. Well, um are you going to are you going to get them then? Like are you thinking about getting one? I am thinking, but they are quite expensive and I can't really justify because even though I'm running out of RAM is because I'm building 20 apps at the same time, too many terminals and too many claw code instances. uh which is not really justifiable uh to to upgrade, but yeah, these are really nice. This I'm in a I'm in a I'm between a rock and a hard place a little bit cuz I have a 16in and I have a 14in M1. Ah, okay. And I don't need 16 in at all. I'm have and and and I think they've really fixed the because there was thermal throttling that was happening. If you bought an M1 Max on a 14 in, you'd get thermal throttling because it's just doesn't have the fan because the fans are physically bigger in the in the 16 in. I think they've kind of fixed that. There's not much of an issue with the thermal throttling. So, you can max out a 14 in and it doesn't actually impact it in any way negatively. Right. Point is, I've got two laptops and I want a 14 in. And I was thinking, oh, I'd update to the 14inch Mac M5 Pro. Thing is, it's rumored to be a design update that's going to happen at the end of the year and it's like it's quite annoying that I've got these two lap I'm trying to sell everything off. I don't know whether I told you this. I'm trying to sell as much as I can off and having two laptops is very much uh excessive. Um although why do you need two? Well, I don't need Isn't it annoying? No, I don't need to. No, that's what I'm saying. I don't need to. The how it came about was I was uh What was I doing? I was curious to kind of test a lot of local LM LLM stuff. So, that's why I wanted the 60. I didn't care for the 16 in. Plus, I was very curious to know if there is any substantial difference between the M1 Max and the M1 Pro. And truth be told, it's marginal. It really is. I mean, I can't speak for every single model, but the experiment was, is there any noticeable difference from what we do between the M1 Max and the M1 Pro? And there really isn't. doing what I more specifically doing what I do. Maybe not what you do, but you know, again, I'm just there to say some coding AI stuff. Um, I should probably run a few local LMS LLMs on my Pro to be honest, but again, I don't think the performance is that much different. Um, yeah, the only other thing to consider is that the M1 Max can have more unified memory. So if you need more unified memory then you have to go max. And so that would be a reason to to go max versus pro. But anyway, ideal situation would be M uh M5 M uh M5 Pro um if I'm doing normal stuff. But if I want to do if I want to be super greedy, I'd probably go I'd just max out a 14 inch to be honest and try and keep that. I would go 16 inch maxing out like everything maxing out and even like the 128 gigabytes so you can have like virtual machines going on. You don't need that. You don't need that. That would still you you know if you want to go crazy. Um but we're looking at the dollar um numbers. If we go to the like the German shop, it's it's ridiculously say five and a half grand or something like that. The uh I think it's cracking into the actually no it be more than that. Yeah, I think it'd be more than that because I I only ever get two terabytes is fine for me. Well, it starts at two teraby. I would be fine with one terabytes because I have cloud. M um so but I do video on my computer so I just need two two terabytes is enough but um uh anyway cool so you're not you're not you're not in the market then not yet I'm also looking waiting to see if there is something uh like the the new redesign and the touchscreen there are like rumors about those and maybe they maybe they will introduce this the whole concept for touchscreen in WWDC first. Oh yeah, there was that as well, isn't there? Yeah. Yeah. Because the issue is not just adding the, you know, the physical layer here. It's the whole software thing. And I I feel like they first have to maybe do something with the software. Maybe they will introduce the MacBook Air with touchscreen first. Maybe because in WWDC they they introduce the software and then they they show maybe a hardware that goes with it. Maybe that's what they will do. But we know there are rumors about uh touch coming to Mac OS. I mean I don't care for touch to be honest but um you know it's more so I don't know. Yeah, it's more so what other what other designer what what what's going to be this big overhaul? What else is going to bring? But um let's let's let's move on to Web Flow. I'm I'm I'm done with Apple now. I'm done with you, Apple. I'm going to sleep now. Cool. So, wait, let me bring up. So, Web Flow is rolling out a super cool feature called component canvas. This is another canvas view that you can have in your uh web flow designer where you see all different versions of your component in one view. So here you see all of your components and you see the different versions, you see the structure, you can edit them and you can have different versions and you see all those versions next to one another. So this is really handy. I had access but right now I don't have access because they are resetting like the roll out and I'm not in the I had it as the beta. So we have this image to show you. But this is pretty much everything about it. You see the different versions next to one another and uh you can edit them. It's just much nicer because now you can like compare them and you can see what is previously you would have to go them one by one to see if there if you change something you would have to go one um after another. Yeah. To see the update. Now you see them next to one. And this is like what's more exciting to me is this direction with like the idea of canvas that is uh web flow taking. They showed it with the new AI gen in the canvas and now they have it here as well. And I would love to see more of this type of like seeing versions next to one another because this is something so powerful to see different designs, different versions, maybe different break points all next to uh each other. And yeah, it's pretty cool. That would like remove the need for Figma if they did that, right? If they did that say pages and stuff. Yeah. And I I told web flow as well uh that uh and I'm sure they know it. This is not something new but all of these companies are trying to take the whole vertical. So framer is trying to do everything from animation to design to development like the whole landing page experience thing. They have CMS now. They have the API, everything. They are trying to own the whole vertical and capture as much of the market as possible. Figma has a really good position, but it feels like they haven't really used their position well. They they have they own the design, the ideation level, and now they have also development with Figma sites. Web Flow is kind of there just sitting around with only the development part which is really strong but I think they should allow like people to to start maybe the design in Webflow or have versioning like versions next to one another and with AI and you know these agents that can generate design for you. be really cool to see like multiple versions in a canvas and then you can choose between them. I think this is kind of like going to be uh and I'm seeing like tools on Twitter to show that that this is going to be the direction for the future of design and websites where you have AI that can make different versions and you pick from them, mix them and then you have you get what you want because what these AIs are good at is like you know generating tons of versions and just burning through tokens. So, yeah. Um, I hope to see more of this. Yeah, it's cool. And also, just finally, is it is it a free flow thing like you can just scroll around and move it around or are they locked? I don't remember. I don't think so. I don't remember. Not here. Um, I I tried to see if I have access to it in any workspace. None of the workspaces I um I have access to have this, but we'll let you know next week. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. TBC. Cool. Nice. GBT5. Should we get in on GBT 5? Let's go talk about GBT 5. So, OpenAI's latest model brings native computer capabilities, allowing agents to operate computers, click through UIs, and handle tasks like emails, data entry, scoring 75% on OS World. We'll get into that. Uh, matching human professionals across 44 occupations. So, the here's the release. It's a really I mean, you mentioned earlier on you're you're very confused about the naming. this might actually resolve that naming. So GBT 5.4 Pro has also been released. So it's GBT 5.4 and GPT 5 um 4 Pro. Um this is GBT 5.4 thinking by the way. Brings together the best of our recent advancements in coding and agentic workflows into single frontier model. It incorporates the industry-leading coding coding capabilities of codeex uh GP 5.3 codecs while improving how the model works across tools, software environments and professional task involving spreadsheets, presentations and documents. So, uh incorporates oopsie uh oh no I've lost it. It incorporates the industry-leading capabilities of codeex. So, incorporates so that this has these coding capabilities built in. So really, if you're using 5.3 codeex, you might as well flip to four because it it's they've kind of baked it into one. It's really annoying how just clicking that clicked through to that page because now I've got lost all my highlights. Let's wing it. Um 1 million uh tokens context. You know what? I haven't been keeping track of uh GBT on its token uh window, but 1 million is is I guess quite good. And it's our most token efficient reasoning model yet. And this is the thing about GBT, especially when you go X high. Uh it it thinks overthinks, you know, it thinks for too long and then gets itself all worked up. So uh these are like the computer scores here. Um uh 83 jumping up to 83 on the GP GDP val. Uh SWEBench Pro, which is the one um I'm interested in. This doesn't seem so high. So maybe SWEBench Pro is a different um thing. Uh but you can see on its coding score, which is the thing I care about, is higher on uh than than GBT3 3 codec. So really cool how they focused a lot more on the technical capabilities of this tool. The interesting thing is it has the same knowledge date as um GPT 5.3 which makes me think that they are using the same training data but they're doing something with reinforced learning to actually kind of tweak the model and help it help improve it based on the same training data which I guess might be which might explain a lot of these point releases that 5 GBT 5 everything GPT5 point is all the same training data just slowly tweaked and manipulated and stuff like that. It might be that and and you notice they're all doing it. So it might be that actually the uh training just costs so much frigin money that they're trying to avoid just training things up every year. We're sort of seeing a bit of a well um what do you call it? not a slump, but we're we're seeing that that uh just training it and training and training isn't actually reaping the rewards, you know, isn't isn't um what's it called when you doesn't compound. Do you know what I mean? Yeah, we've hit a bit of a wall. So, um it's really annoying that I've lost all my um my marks cuz now I'm kind of at a loss now. Either way, um, better at all of the kind of stuff that you're, uh, used to really. And I will definitely be using it in codecs, which actually we were going to do a test, weren't we? Yeah, I was going to I was going to I was going to because here's the thing that people have been noticing about GBT 5.4 codecs. It's not great at front-end design. And my argument here is that they're not really giving it the best uh opportunity for success. They are just telling it or or assessing its design capabilities by giving it a single prompt and telling it to build me a a dashboard or whatever. So, what I'm going to do is bear with me. Um, I am going to whack open codeex and I worked on my own, um, the codeex app from uh, sorry. Yeah. Yeah. I always mix it because when you say codeex, I automatically think of the codeex cli. I mean, you know, it doesn't really matter. Yeah, the Codex app. So, I've got GBT 5.4 selected here. Let's go. Let's go high. And I built a Frame IO clone because I need to get my video signed off and all the rest of it. So, um I actually got and the video will be released next week. I actually got Jeep, uh Gemini 3.1 to design it. I think it looks sick. But what we're going to do, and we'll probably come back to it later on in the episode, is we're going to set this off to, um, do a redesign. So, uh, but I want to give it a skill. Here's the thing that there are skills that are being Oh, hello. that are not being Oh my god, what's going on here? I hit enter. Uh, you can stop. Yeah. Yeah. You can stop that. Um, I'm going to give it a skill, a front-end design skill, because I think this is really important that we we learn how to give the LLMs the task or at least the the abilities to to do that. So, bear with me two seconds. Um, skills. Yeah. So, that's I'm off I'm just off screen now. Giving it a skill. Yeah. Front end design skill. Here we go. Front end design. Right. Is that going to set off a thing? So, I'm going to give it a front end design skill and I'm going to say um uh give me Do you want to give me some prompts here? It's like give me an exper experimental or do we go clean and cool? Do we do like modern and sleek? Yeah, but uh add some nice interactions and design elements. I don't think that's design though. I think we can do that, but I don't inherently think just because it's got interactions means it's design. We're f we're focusing on the design of the app right now. So that's color spacing. Color spacing things like this and and does it have taste basically. So, um, let's go throw tasty in some nice animations while you're at it. So, give me a modern, sleek, uh, modern, sleek, and tasteful redesign of this app. Boom. Should we let it Should we just let it do its thing because it might take a little while. Yeah. and come back to it. And you're on high, interestingly enough. I'm on high because I I I I let it run on e uh extra high all the time pretty much. Yeah, I I I I normally do, but I don't think this is an extra high task to be honest. Yeah. And um I don't want it just to take ages and ages and ages. So, let's uh it's it's got the scope. Let's let's come back to it and let's see where it's going because whilst we're on the codeex, we might as well talk about this. They have registered over a million active users, weekly active users um since launching, which is quite crazy. Um growing 400% since early 2026. Um, and that's that's I mean I'm using it, but I do have you said you didn't see this, but I thought that they've been giving away double usage. There's like a a deal they've been giving out. The only thing I could think about is this tweet that I found from Samwin. really really doesn't matter too much. But um uh we'll keep codeex available to free and go users after this promotion. We may have to reduce limits, but we want everyone to be a try try codeex and start building. I'm pretty sure I saw something that that um they're extending the the promotion or something like this. I don't know. But either way, you I mean we I've been using it pretty pretty heavily and and you were saying that you've you've actually well have you have you moved over to codeex? Yeah, I'm using codeex app for pretty much everything because of the the rates. Yeah, the usage with cloud code. Um, I do like run clot code for one project at a time because like I can barely work through one project at a time before it running out. With codeex, I cannot even get close to even like using 50%. Right now I'm at 72% of my weekly and that's after like tons and tons of use. um all on extra high many tasks at the same time, many projects at the same time. I'm talking about like seven, eight, 10 projects at the same time. I'm just like moving like from a task to another as fast as I can complete and it's very tiring but it's still has a lot left. What is about uh how how how much uh have you been using it? Like what is your I'm always I'm always swapping around. I'm always I'm always playing around. Um I um I've been using Claude a lot just because I I really do like Claude. Um but yeah, I know the usage is better and I have a subscription to um you know to to to use it. So, why not? Um, where is this? Sorry, I'm I'm I'm getting the codeex presentation ready for you. What I also noticed that I like about Claude is um like the responses that I get are more concise. I feel like CHP just talks a lot and Yeah. Well, this is it. That's why I didn't go extra high, right? Yeah. I don't know. Um, but yeah, um, I'll be I'll be sorting this out in the background, so don't don't don't hold up for me. But let's Should we Should we move on? Yeah. Web haptics. Okay, let's Do you want to go through this one? Um, yeah, sure. Yeah, you do it while I get this design ready then. Uh, let me grab also my phone. This one is really cool. All right. So now you can have haptics on your website uh using web haptics. So this is like my phone and all of these when I like click them I I get a vibration. And this previously not was not possible. uh it was only possible if you had a native app, but now you can have it through a website. So you can install it on your website when people click on a button uh to get a haptic. And what's really cool about it is you can as you see here uh you can design it. So all of these that you see are essentially uh vibrations with like different frequency and different length uh essentially like different strength and you can animate uh you you can like custom made whatever you want and when a user interacts with your website they get a haptic on their uh phone and this you told me this is kind of like a hack. Yeah. So they've they've figured out a way to um I think only on Safari it's a hack. You you you bind the event to like a checkbox an input a checkbox input and then you create it through that. I have a feeling that navigator.vibrate works on you know um Android phones and all the rest of it. I have Android phone here so I might I could maybe check. But yeah, it's a weird little hack they found and and all they've done is wrap a library around it cuz you can go on to this. If you scroll down, there's a little customized thing down the bottom that allows you to edit what what it is that you want. And it's so interesting because you've got these different uh they've got like success, error, things like that. And how they've how they're able to capture that in in vibrations is quite cool, don't you think? Yeah, it like you can feel it like it makes sense. It's a really good design. So when I click on success, it does like the it feels like a tick. It's like ding ding. It's like you can feel it. And the nudge is, you know, a nudge. Error is like no no, you know, it's like a bound a bon. And the boss is obviously a buzz. Um and these are just the the pre-made ones. And yeah, they they're really cool. First time I saw it on Twitter, I was like, "What is this about?" But then you told me and I tested it on my phone. I really encourage you to just go to the link below and just click the buttons and it it's just so fun. Maybe a part of it is because I'm on an iPhone and iPhones have like really good haptic um engines. But yeah, uh it's pretty cool. I'm I'm like seriously considering adding this to my next website. I don't know for a contact button or something. I will have a section on my phone playing memory. Like literally like the game memory with cards will be on my website. So this is like an amazing thing to add to it. For example, when you uh when you have the cards and you have it wrong, you get the the error and when you have it right, you get the, you know, the success uh vibration. It's just fun and adding to the depth of the experience. And yeah, I'm going to I'm going to use it. Uh did you notice there's also a skill that you can download to help you use the library? Not that it's massively complex, but this obvious This won't be in the training data. So, you're going to need some sort of way of telling the AI. Yeah. Yeah, it makes sense. It still makes sense to have that. Yeah, it's not in the training data because it's just so new. Uh, this is done by Loi, a design engineer. I see you have it mentioned. So, yeah. Yeah, design engineers are cool, man. And uh there was a guy who does a lot of cool stuff. Um where is it? I will share my screen, don't worry. Um what's his name? Something AJ AJ Ji. He's he's been playing with it before and yeah, there's a lot of conversation in in the in the tweet um around the hack with the with the checkbox which is it's so funny how they how they can figure that out and how I wonder how I want to look at the code. I I have seen the code but I wonder how you get the different intensities and things like this. Um so you can essentially have two different you have two different parameters. One is the intensity that is like the the vibration how strong it is and the other one is the length how long it takes. And with just these two you can create like like actual feelings like the success and the error they do distinctively feel different. Well, I mean, yeah, I think it just it will add this new layer. I think I'll be definitely uh figuring out um how it's done. Don't really mind. Don't really care, but it's uh it's cool. I like it. Uh Jay is saying, "Huh, nice. Never consider building an abstraction for this one as it uh always felt like Apple could pull the hack at any moment." That's true. Apple could take it away. uh made some demos around this for config in the past uh where I'd leverage GAP trigger uh ticker for the dotclick uh to get different intensity rates. Uh interesting. Okay. Yeah, really cool. People are loving it. Got 1.8 million views. So, yeah, obviously people are loving it. Nice. Uh, I'm still sorting out these designs by the way. I'm just seeing Yeah, still going. We should have gotten an extra high. So, we kind of It would It would take So, maybe that's why, by the way, that that's I that's also something I have noticed that with uh I feel like claude code is just faster or maybe does it faster? I mean, I'm on extra high, so that might be something I look into. Anyway, I want to mention something else that I you asked about the web flow component uh canvas that I didn't answer properly. So, you can actually navigate uh with scroll, pan, and zoom. So, even though we I don't have access right now and I can't remember if you could zoom or not, we can see here that indeed you can zoom. And that was my microwave in the background. Speaking of web haptics, we have stream. Nice. Cool. All right. Well, let's let's move on to the next one. Let's talk about Quen 3.5. Um, that one is yours. Yeah. And so, Alibaba introduced Quen 3.5 in line with smaller open weight models aimed at strong reasoning, multimodal performance, and much lower deployment cost, signaling how quickly open model quality is compressing. Now, I tried to download the um download it onto my computer. However, the the real secret is the very very small version that will should be able to run on your on your phone. But we'll get into that. Let me share my screen. And Quen, oh boy, Quen. So Quen is actually owned by Alibaba. Did you know that? No, actually, but it kind of makes sense in a way. They're like huge company. Yeah. Um, and they do have this Quen 3.5 plus which is hosted in their Alibaba cloud model studio which we'll talk about in a second. Now I'm always interested in the three bench and again it's all real world usage. You know we can only go by you can get an indication of benchmarks just to see and when things have been benchmaxed it's hard to even know whether to even believe them. But it's this is this is Opus. This is um where are we? GBT 5.2. two. This is Opus. This is Gemini 3 Pro. So, it's scoring better than Gemini 3 Pro on SW Bench, which is, you know, good to hear. Good to see. And um it's a it's a cheap Chinese model. Do you know what I mean? So, again, I think this is good for light projects, people just getting into it, people kind of just wanting a cheaper alternative. Um does vision as well. Like I really like Miniax M2.5, but the thing is about Miniax M2.5, which by the way they don't compare against because it does better. I think they compare against uh uh Kimmy K2 somewhere. Uh Miniax M2.5 is only text, doesn't do vision. So from a mo multimodal perspective, it's quite a quite a good quite a good little thing. Um, so this is the I want to do a video on this because their $10 a month plan supports Kimmy K2 and Miniax and GLM and Coen provides up to 18,000 requests per month and it's just for $10. Now we've got uh Lama here which is probably, you know, competing up against Llama. O Lama, they start at $20 and they're very uh vague about your actual usage. Um they just they actually don't say anything for the Pro and they say five times more usage than Pro, but you do get that flexibility because I think a lot of people are looking for that flexibility. Now, I was looking at the um T's and C's on this and I misread it. Let me go back. Um, are you gonna go back? Basically, I thought I'd read that you can't use it on anything or any automations or anything that you're not in front of directly using it, you know. Uh, and that ruled out maybe it's here. Um, that ruled out open claw, but they actually explicitly mention that it can be used for open crawl. You say clawed code and open claw is interesting. I is all all gravy baby. Um trying to find the page now. Oh, we got something from um Yeah, I can't Oh, here it is. Maybe it's this one. No, it just goes back to there. Anyway, I'm going to do a video on this. I'm going to do a video on the ability to change it around the price and the usage and things like that. But yeah, you get access to Quen and you get access to Quen 3.5 Plus, which is uh obviously the badass one. So, the thing about this though, the thing about this, if I can find my phone, is that they've managed to get it to six gig, this version. Um, and there's a lovely app actually. Um, I used to I used to use a local L. Have you do you ever use any sort of local LMS or anything like that? No. I I kind of have this tendency to go for that absolute strongest best ultra max pro. Yes, the old the old Maximillian. So, there's this nice app. Don't even know what it's called to be honest. Um that's really nice and it you can use just uh you can is that in focus? You can use just Apple Foundation models, but you can also use Quen 3.5 on on your phone. And this is all completely 100% um local. I want to find the name of this app so I can actually Here we go. If I just put it in the chat. Um yeah, nice little thing just to run. You can't I mean you can't necessarily This is when This is when handoff just decides to not to to stop working. Yeah, it is. Um, search on Google. Let's see. Oh, here it is. Locally AI. Locally AI. AI. Ah, okay. So, are these like offline and private personal assistants? So yeah, if you ever want to play with it, I I don't know what phone you have, but it, you know, it works fine on this, but it's um Yeah, let's Yeah, I just set something off. Run it. It's all right. Just wrote a little email there for me. Took like no time at all. Um but yeah, anyway, another step forward for Yeah. uh GDPR compliance issues. GDPR, you know, I don't know if you Yeah, I don't know what people want to do on their phones or whatever, but I don't know like what can we ask it because it's like again having like the world's information in your pocket like let's write a new conversation. Let's say like I don't know um uh distance from uh Earth to Jupiter. I mean this is more of a Google search to be fair. It tells me 484 million kilometers took took two seconds. Thing is I don't know like like where's it's like trust me bro. Yeah. uh we we know for a fact that like these models if they don't have access to the internet and if they are not thinking they perform quite bad like well they they are just much better with these two skills they are kind of like very basic skills that you need or like tools uh that they need to have well it's four billion parameters And it is 3 gig, you know, and has vision as well. So, it has vision baked in. Okay. Um, yeah. So, I don't know. It's really useful to have these type of models if you um if you want to go back in time and bring your phone with you to restart civilization. It really is. Um, do you want to take do you want to do perplexity whilst I sort this this design thing out? Yeah, let me actually Yeah. Uh, I I can take that, but I I would like to also check the article and I would like to bring Preplexity. Uh, cool. Maybe there's a blog article as well. I would like to get that as well. Cool. I got that. Oh, they have a nice blog. Um, okay. Second work data. It's really annoying. My um the base website isn't even loading. But let's see if the work tree loads. Okay, I'll I'll go with Proplexity. So, Proplexity just introduced Proplexity Computer, which is essentially a virtual machine that is going to be your assistant, kind of like Open Claw, but from Perplexity. You can give it any sort of task, and it has access to all of the best of the best models. It can decide what models to choose for what tasks and just do it for you. Uh that is like the tasks are things like creating a website or a web app. It can run like for hours at a time. Uh you can you know kind of like open claw you can sleep and just before sleeping give it a task. It can collect data. It can do analysis and do a bunch of things like this. So, it's pretty cool, but it's not exactly like something that I would expect Perplexity to do, but they've done it and I've heard a lot of good things about it. So, uh but first, let's start with the first uh like the biggest um not like the biggest problem, but uh we need to edit this out. But before we go on, this is something that you need to have the $200 subscription for to use it. So it is quite expensive but that makes it to be kind of on the same boat with uh clot code with uh chat GPT like the pro um the the pro subscription that you can have and this one can do significantly more and it does it all in the cloud. Uh, I talked to Christian from the community. He uses Perplexity Computer and he has been building tons of apps and he showed me the results. They were they were quite good. They were like quite good because it's using cloth code, it's using uh codecs, whatever it needs, it it takes a model and uses it. Um so perplexity computer operates the software stack just like a human coworker uh by using a computer. It reasons, it delegates, it searches and it has memory, it remembers. So that's why it's it's like a again like an open claw service all set up for you and it can just go on and do these things with by having access to a browser and a computer. Uh yeah. So that's pretty cool that they are doing and I don't know if you have much to add here. Well, I did they did you say he sent you the um uh what do you call it? The screenshots? No, he he he couldn't send me but he showed me the stuff that he was uh doing with it. similar in a way to the things that we do with the difference that he he needs to be less involved in it uh with these things because he can tell the agent and there is like kind of like an orchestrator agent from Proplexity that chooses what model to use and you know kind of uh understand the tasks and just you know go goes on where with cloud code you you have to kind of like go step by step. Same with Codeex. That's that's what what I see as being the biggest uh difference here. Well, um I mean it's cool. I don't know whether it's worth 200 bucks. Like what what do you think? What do you where are they getting that from? Uh I I think it is worth 200 bucks a month. So um for people who've been like there are people paying clot code and codeex 200 um dollar a month and the thing with perplexity computer is that it you can use different models and it's just much easier to set up. You just log in, you have a dashboard and you build different projects where with these other tools you kind of you're dealing with the CLI or you are dealing with buggy apps. I mean the codeex app is very uh buggy for me. The the cloth code is taking too much RAM. So it has these like nice features and the fact that it runs uh on on the cloud. Uh I think it is it is worth it for somebody who wants to build a few apps or just you know you have like a specific use case you need to build it but you don't want to be involved with it too much or you don't want to have it only locally. This builds it and hosts it for you. it, you know, pushes it for to GitHub. It kind of just takes care of everything where, you know, if you build it locally, you have to you do need to have a kind of like a technical level of knowledge or deal with the models to help you set up your local um you know, server and run it every time and things like that and host it and choose a hosting platform. This does it all for you. Fair enough. Yeah, the results are in. Okay, cool. Then uh let me see if Yes. Let me see if for perplexity if we have anything else that you had in the uh in the notes. AP reduce reliance company peritting from Okay. Yeah, I think you had we talked about everything that you had. Yeah. So, ladies and gentlemen, this is what you get. This is what you get when you dedicate an AI to design only. Okay? Where you get to focus on the design, not one shop prompt, build me an app, and by the way, make it look absolutely beautiful. This is a separate task that just says do me a design. Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you in the red corner GBT 5.4 with a front-end design skill. What do you think? Okay. Okay. This h this looks like my my drinks app very much. I can What did you use to design it? Replet. I saw this and I was like I guess that's Oh, no. Replet uses 3.1. Yeah, that so to be honest it's nice but it's very open AI looking for me. They have this tendency experiencing they have this tendency to uh do this like extra round corners like the corners are always so rounded and I I literally had this and I told my I had a very similar design and I told my uh codeex to remove the the serif font and also don't make the corners so so round and don't have like too many corners. But that aside, I think it's pretty decent. So, the only the only thing that really bothers me, it's kind of done some weird stuff like Yeah. doubled up live session and like there's there's a a card within a card here within a card within a you know, so many this is like card hell. Exactly. Now, exactly. But the font is quite nice. Um if we go into create workspace uh let me log in. So I see it it it's trying like different things that are Oh it has like the animations. So it's got it's got I can create projects and things like this. It's do you know what it's done though? It's really changed new. Oh that screwed that up. It's really changed a lot. And what I want to show you here as well is the GPT3 design uh Gemini 3 design which I will stick to um because I think it looks probably better to be honest. But this is uh what this is only screenshots. I can't get the app running to to show you it. So this is this is what it created. Okay. Yeah, this is a bit uh more like edgy and unique. The other one did look like my drinks app to be honest a lot. And without interacting with it, I I find it hard to show you. It does feel like very like blinky. Everything's like a like the Matrix kind of like like everything blinks in. This is one of the projects I made uh in the in the app. And then and then this is like the upload screen. Very very simple, but it all of the effects felt very glitchy and blippy and and you can imagine all these like sounds going off. And the app the name of the app's green lit as well, by the way. Okay, so I I'm going to stick with that. It's green, obviously. And there's, you know, a couple of things going back to back to GBT's uh you know, go. Um, we were we were quite lazy. The the only thing I will say we were quite lazy in in in the prompting. So, I'm sure a better prompt might actually, you know, um, do do a better job. I should have said do not change the layout you know because it really has added you saw the difference between this is the project upload screen you know um it really has changed a lot whereas I should have said don't change anything about the product and I was lucky in in the instance of the the Gemini version is that I didn't say that either. So this is again I think quite important. And I'll be making a video about this, by the way, um about putting these designs up against each other and getting the best out of them. And one of them will be build your app, but then have it uh potentially even do like a design review or something like that. So, yeah, I'm I'm pleasantly surprised. I'm not I'm not I don't hate this design. um a lot more creative than I thought it would be. But you compare this to some of the designs that people are are complaining about and they're very much um you know classic AI generated kind of functional design over something that's slightly creative. This feels to me like something slightly more creative and this is this is raw GBT 5.4. So yeah, this works. This is like I I wouldn't change too much except for the probably the boxes within boxes. And I mean look at it. Look at this. Isn't don't you see this similarity similarities just just with Yeah. But you can tell this is AI generated I would say. Yeah. And this is from the gradients do it. Yeah. This is from some time ago. And I didn't give it any design direction. This is more about the functionality of the app. Mhm. And once you fine from that perspective, yeah, I will I will change it. But I yet to find a design skill or a library that help me. I I want I want something like but more creative. Um but I I guess that's a part of it. Why don't you create your own skill? Why can't you have an Why can't you create your own skill that does your thinking of how you go about design? The things that go through your mind and build a skill and see what that does. I I'm creating a UI library actually. Well, it's for controls, but maybe a UI library for Yeah, but I'm not talking about a library because you want every product to be unique like Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Based on maybe maybe this skill actually takes you through the like keywords, brand keywords or something like that has more of a process behind the unique application of this particular design. Do they want fun? Do they want serious? Do they want bold? Do they want result? Do you know what I mean? The classic journey of how you come up with the design. build that into a skill and have it then run through your design methodology as all as part of that skill. Yeah, I'm I'm going to check also the skill directory and see if there is something like that for it. Yeah. Yeah, definitely good place to start and then you can edit it and you know whatever. So because there are like web design guidelines uh I see it has like 139. So let me share my screen. So again, we covered this in another video, but skills.sh uh and I just searched for design and we have web design guidelines. We have the front-end design and these have a lot of like stars or like installs. Um maybe they are good. So I will I will try them. I think that front end design was the one that I used. Okay, this is from Antropics and this one is from Versel. Oh, maybe not anthropic, but okay, fair enough. Mine just go front end design. I don't know whether it was from anthropic. It might be. I don't know. Uh, I can't read it from here, right? No, I wish I could read it just from the website. Yeah, that it should do that, shouldn't I? I need to click it. Yeah, it's just a text. What about the source? What's that? What's that guideline source? That URL here. What's that? Yeah, what's that? So, should I just open that up? See if that's it. Oh, yeah. Okay, that works. Oh, there you go. That works. Not Not even that big, but then it might be It might be referencing some other supporting files, but yeah, not that big. It's accessibility stuff. Focus, form, animation, typography. It's Yeah, it's kind of like standard stuff. Yeah. Yeah. And I think that's all you need. I think that's a good start with that and then build on it. You like maybe you, you know, you want it lightweight enough where it's able to flex around. But I definitely think yeah, some input from you in terms of like brand keywords and and all that lot can help it rather than the standard like stuff because this is the standard stuff and it's Yeah. Exactly. Right. It's okayish but it's it's functional, you know. It's functional. It's not exciting. It doesn't make me if I if I see this, it doesn't make me like, "Oh, wow. H how was that designed?" You know? So, so I put a post out uh on LinkedIn about um uh Figma charging for their AI stuff and also just generally how AI is changing based on the Figma code to canvas tool call on the MCP, right? Um and a designer got up in arms in the comments saying like you know when you let me just read out the comment actually um because I don't want to get it wrong but I don't know whether we've released my rant or my thing on the comment section would be next. Yeah. So, uh, look, uh, where is he? I've opened up the comment, which is, uh, there we go. Cool. Um, they said, "Try to vibe code something without Figma designs and you'll get the same design as everyone else. Asking for a line change or change of the line cell shouldn't be a question. uh these dribble posts are annoying, blah blah blah. Uh same design as everyone else. My response is that you like you just you begin to realize that design is not important for a lot of things like for something functional like like your dashboard especially getting up and running. The important thing is is this working? Does this actually work? Is this useful? Otherwise, you've spent so much time designing something that actually ends up not being functionally useful. So, you might as well use a design that yeah, does look all the same to try a product. And if it works and you don't honestly design much of an impact on it, it works with the same design. then there's no reason to bring in any sort of design aspects for some projects. For others, absolutely. Absolutely. It's got to look cool and and whatever, especially if it's public facing, you know, it's a SAS product or if it's just something that you, as you said yourself, you just want to enjoy looking at. Absolutely. But I think this has just created now the divide of like some apps can function and provide more ROI when you just don't when it just has the same design as everything else. Do you know what I mean? So, uh it seems like it's it's it's gaining a bit of momentum on the responses there. So, I um I'll be interested to read that. Um but yeah, anyway, that's my input. I think we just we don't need design all the time, you know. We don't we just don't the the bare minimum the average is fine. You know the design is often invisible. Like when you want to get something done the design shouldn't you know be getting in the way. The design is just a functionality in that sense. So it depending on where you are defining design and what is the what is the problem essentially you are solving. In some cases you want to design to to be seen you know to levitate from whatever everybody else is doing and sometimes you just want to blend in and get something done and working. And I think notion is a really good example of that. they they've been really good with design. I feel like they they've been minimal in um places where it matters and in some others they are also like uniquely themselves. So yeah. No, I agree. Yeah. I think this other person here is saying like again their their brain is just locked into like but we're just going to have to design it. And what I'm saying is some instances, yeah, you will absolutely have to redesign it or work a different way or whatever, but there are just so many use cases that you don't need design. You've just proven it and you yourself are a designer. You just wanted to get something up and running and now you're designing proactively. Do you know what I mean? Um, but I I just there are so many designers especially, some of them are so locked in they can't flex. Do you know what I mean? Like if it like again I I think correct me if I'm wrong developers probably have more to worry about than designers. Like ridiculous amount. Yes. And yet it's it's it's crazy. Like we're we're all we're all coding is just not necessary. Like we could sit here and complain that AI code is [ __ ] but most designers would be like but it works. It's the same argument, right? It's the same argument, but the code is [ __ ] It works well. Okay. Well, it works with a [ __ ] design. So, you know, but I think but um the reason why I say that is just because I think uh developers are a lot less in denial about what's happening than designers. Designers seem to be very much rejecting what's going on um than developers, I think, is what it seems. I work on my own all day, so take that with a pinch of salt. Do you know what I mean? I barely speak to many developers, but that's just what it feels like based on responses of my content. Uh, should you move on? Cuz speaking of Gemini 3.1, Google quietly launched Gemini 3.1 Flash Light. I like I the naming of uh of uh products is is crazy. I just don't understand it. But um yeah, they've uh it's their super super fast model. And I mean, let's just go through it real quick. I don't know what I'd be using this for to be honest. I think Google are great as an everyday model. I've always thought that. Uh but I don't use it to code. Um yeah, cost effective. I guess this might be quite good for OpenClaw to be honest. something fast, something that you just need to get stuff done. Um, cost effective. 25 in, $130 out. Uh, I don't know what the difference is between flash and flash light. Maybe it's maybe it's something that can run on something super uh small like a phone. Um, don't really know, but it's here. Attactive intelligence at scale for developers. How crazy is this? Why Why are they talking about developers? This is crazy. I would I wouldn't even use their pro model for development. So, 3.1 Flashlight can tackle tasks at scale like high volume translation and content moderation where cost is a priority. So, I guess you're you're sacrificing maybe intelligence and maybe some accuracy at the the price like cuz there are some things like translation to be honest where it's so easy for it to do. You don't need it to think. It's all baked into the data. You don't need skills. You don't need to do any of that. Maybe it's good for this sort of stuff. um 20% higher success rate, 60% faster in inference times than our previous model. So with latitude enabling latitude deliver sophisticated storytelling to a much wider audience than would have otherwise been possible. So I'm guessing they are I don't know what latitude are but I'm guessing they need to do some translation stuff so they can you know promote it to different audiences uh different countries and stuff like that. So yeah, Google Google's still chugging away there, you know. But yeah, um I tell you what though, I have been using and and it comes into me using Claude um uh co-work and things like this. I'm I've been I think I've been underplaying and and under um appreciating Claude as a conversational uh model. I think it's really good at asking questions and being quite meticulous with its responses. What I've really enjoyed as well is that I used to use nan to write my LinkedIn post based on our conversations of this the show. I take the transcript and I build posts out from them. I've now built a Claude skill from it. So I run it on Claude code or Claude co-work doesn't matter. And I've been really impressed with how it's actually taken, sorry, it's taken what we've actually said and and and and brought that into the writing. Now, it might seem a bit dumb that it's kind of done that. It's been quite but it's but that's what I want from these posts. I don't want it to fluff up what it's been saying, you know? It's almost like um Gemini because that Gemini, sorry, I should have said Gemini is what's I've bound to the NA workflow. I could I could use um uh uh Claude, but I want to make the most of my subscription, right? It's cheaper. So, um but yeah, I want it, but it seems like Gemini wants to kind of fluff up what it's saying. It's just it's it's being too it's too intelligent, if that makes sense. is saying too many words whereas Claude seems to be to the point with those posts and then as I say generally um I launched a service called shipfast which I'll make a video on and and talk about that whole process which is uh me offering up to build AI products and things like that and I discussed through Claude what it should be called what how it should be priced and um the the considerations about the target market and stuff like that and it was just really good as a conversational AI to to help bring that to life. So, um maybe I said to you, I'm I am considering buying the the $200 a month plan because I'm just using it for absolutely everything. I kind of really really enjoy Claude as a model. Obviously, I want to give 5.4 a go run for its money, but um see what codeex is like and sorry, Gupt 5.4 for um like the chat is like and things like that. Uh because people are saying it's very very good. But yeah, I'm I'm I've sort of always not really thought of Claude as anything other than good for code, but I I personally have been mistaken. It's kind of my go-to. Yeah, I'm using it on my phone as well. Um I prefer I prefer the writing. I prefer the the short answers. Me too. Um yeah, in general it is more pleasant and I don't really enjoy the starters that uh Open AAI has like Absolutely. That's a great question you are asking. Just Yeah, Claude has this way of being being friendly and charming but without sucking your dick. Yeah, it's being a bit more prag pragmatic about pragmatic but still being relatable. That's such a and I think that's such a fine line to draw. Yeah, it's not like cold like I I generally like my AI just to do the job, get it done, but Claude seems to manage to just cross over that line of being just like, yeah, I'm here I'm I'm helpful. I'm friendly, but we're also here to do some freaking work. Do you know what I mean? Yeah. So, it's Yeah. I don't know. I don't know. Something I've just been growing growing fond of uh Claude to do more than just my code. So, speaking of Claude though, they've released a voice mode. Yeah. And basically, there's a little video here which I'm going to mute because last time we got done slashvoice allows you to just literally speak about what you want in Claude Code. Now, I have no doubt this will come to Claude Cowork and Claude desktop and whatever. If it's not already there, I don't know. I'll have a real quick look now. Um, yeah, it doesn't look like they've got voice mode in the thing. So, it's interesting how it's come to Claude Code first. But, um, definitely definitely welcome. And, um, you know, we were talking about u Whisper. Whisper is kind of my go-to uh thing. And you've just recently discovered Whisper as well. Yeah. And did you So did you find it from Lemmy's? Yes. Yes. And I was like, let me give it a try. Because I've been using just the Mac. Yeah. Same. Voice input. And if you're watching this, you might be like, well, your device has a like a button on the keyboard. You press and you talk to it and it understands and it works. And I've been using it, too. And it's fine until you try whisper whisper and and then you're like, "Holy [ __ ] this is this it's about like the very fine there's a fine line how they it's an AI that listens to you, fixes your grammar, styles your voice uh input without changing what you are saying. it doesn't rewrites it. It just fixes like little things. So, and that makes a big difference when it's when you're writing in a group or like to to somebody or like just writing to AI, you you say something and then you start listing things and it puts it in a list like it creates a bulleted list. Yeah. Sorry, I got I got to guess for a second. No worries. Um, yeah. So, uh, what I like about it is, and and I used to use my Mac builtin or my iPhone built-in microphone to like text stuff, mostly text. I wouldn't I don't I I speak my initial prompt that I give my AI. Like, if I'm starting a project, I'll I'll speak that, but I won't do it like they're demonstrating in that video. I won't do it throughout the day. It will be something that I'm really trying to think about what it is that I'm doing, whereas I tend to just prefer typing my everyday like coding prompts. That's just me though. Uh but yeah, the built-in microphone on my iPad, on my iPhone, um uh the sorry, not even the built-in microphone, but the built-in dictation, I found it was getting stuff wrong all the freaking time. all of the freaking time. Like it would mishar me. I don't know whether stuff was on the microphone and it just just didn't listen or misheard a word. And the amount of times I've gone back and edited text because it's just not whatever. So, not only does Whisper and by the way, um but Windows it kind of sucks. Interesting because obviously in the background it's using the same AI and whatever. What What doesn't What sucks about it? Um, like is it the is it like how it's um what do you call it? How you how you uh trigger it or or whatever? Or is it just the way it just can't hear you or something? Um I was just saying that the eye, yes, it does format stuff and that's great and that's really cool and it will, you know, exclamation points, commas, all the right places. understands when you're excited about something or it sounds like what you're saying is like thanks exclamation point or something like that. It lags. Yeah, that's interesting. Um, so um yeah, I've been using it on my iPhone as well. Well, this is what I was going to go on to say as well. So, I've downloaded as a keyboard on my iPhone and my thing the annoying thing is is that on my that's boring. I won't even talk about that. I'm just talking about D'vorate keyboard. But um yeah, it' be nice if uh you could be a easily switch between whisper and sometimes it closes the app so it has to go to Whisper and then come back to the app that you're on. Do you ever find that uh not it's not quite seamless. I I put uh you you can bind it to a shortcut on that extra button that you have. So I I I click that. It won't leave the app. It won't leave the app anymore if you do that. So you do that. Uh it runs the AI. It it is about the permission for using the microphone. Sure. Sure. So it uses the microphone if you bind it to that key uh um on on your phone. Uh what is really cool about it is if you speak multiple languages. So I have it on three languages. It it doesn't have it in Kurdish, but I have it in the other three that I talk to. And I don't have to select the language like how you normally do with a keyboard. I mean if you if you speak multiple languages, many people don't have this problem. But I have four keyboards installed on my iPhone on my all my devices and I use all four of them. With Whisper, I have just this keyboard and I just talk to it and it knows what language it is automatically. It inserts the text. It's not laggy and it's working just perfectly fine. on on my Mac it's also not laggy. I I don't have it on my Windows because I don't use my Windows that much for typing but maybe I will install it there as well. Um and additionally what's really cool you have a history of everything you have said. So in if you want to do like if you are working with AI and maybe there is something that you say it's a prompt you want to grab it and use it somewhere else you just go to the history and you have access to it. So that's really nice. You can also change the style of the output so it can style your text a little bit. for example, it can make it more formal. Um, if you are in the email app or if you are inside of Gmail, it makes it more formal. You can set those up easily. Um, so yeah, it's a it's one of those examples where a company does one thing. It's not like doing a bunch of things. It's just one thing and it does it so nicely, so so well. And it it is changing the way I'm using my computer. I'm m for the majority of my time I'm using whisper flow if I'm saying something. Another thing that is really cool a use case um to my project manager who she's also doing like everything uh in the team kind of like as like an assistant way. I gave her a long long long list of things like I I went outside and I walked and I started talking and it was many long text and then she was like that's so much text maybe voice would have been better but I was like no this is better you know why because the text was stylized it was clean text we gave that text to Claude cowork and then we had a list of like to-dos to-do and then Claude uh Claude Co-work added that to our notion. So going from ideas, writing it down, giving it to Claude co-worker code to put it in notion with the notion MCP all with just not many clicks or any clicks at all. It's just like with um I and and good to bring it back to Claw as well because I don't have access to it. I've just checked now, tried update, whatever. They're rolling out slowly. I wonder if they're at this capability is being added to Claude or they're using uh whisper because if it was going to work, I was going to say a list of things. I was going to tell it a shopping list to see if it would format it um or if it would just type it out, right? um to warp the terminal that you and I use as well. They they use Whisper, which tells me that it's an API that you can use it just like 11 Labs or something like that that you can use it uh in in your apps as well. So, we've got Sarand here in the comments uh saying about the Windows app being rubbish. And yeah, I think the API aspect, the actual translation aspect is fine, but the rapping app is a bit [ __ ] Um maybe maybe build your own app and then using the Whisper Flow API or something like that. But it's uh yeah, I think voice, you know, Siri obviously being um you know, a very contentious thing was the I remember when it first came out, people were like, "Oh, I'm not going to speak to my phone." Gosh. Now it's just like, "Yeah, blah blah blah blah." Do you know what I mean? Like text speaking out loud is just like it's it's so much easier sometimes. But before you just came back on, I was just saying I use my voice and I use whisper. You'll see it on my videos is when I'm re it's my initial prompt. I don't code with it during the day really. I speak to I do other things with my voice, but I don't code with it with my voice during the day. So, um yeah, it's uh it'll be interesting to see who, how, what people use the voice mode for on Claude and or if it's Claude doing the translation or if they're integrating Whisper Flow and covering the costs for it. But it's still pretty cool anyway. Yeah. Uh, workspace CL. What's the time? Uh, six o'clock, right? We've got workspace CLI. Do you want to do Figma slots? Yeah, we can we can do or or should we do workspace CLI? Um, workspace CLI is a bit boring, isn't it? Yeah, it is. I don't know the use cases for it. That's I mean, you told me, but it's kind of Okay, do slots and then we'll finish with the D. Yes. So, let me bring the I have the files, which by the way, guys, we we we often talk about this Lemy's newsletter, right? And I hate this term because everyone says it, but it's a definitely a cheat code. You pay about $120 for the year, but it gives you back cursor, replet, lovable, bolt, whisper, warp, terminal, which is one thing, one I use. It gives you hundreds of dollars back in AI tooling that I actually use. Like, it's not like There we go. So, you've got Bolt there, Canva. I think that's for the for the level up that I have though, not for uh Yeah, bit. Me too. I I have this one as well. Uh we got this one last year and we got other tools. Now this year you can upgrade to this and get more. So you get directly 50 bucks of cursor just extra whisper flow warp. Uh these are good but sign up to railway sign up to replet. Replet. I absolutely love warp. I absolutely love. Yeah. You know, I owe I I owe so much of my career right now to to this newsletter. Yeah. So much. Like, I wouldn't be able to afford it otherwise. Yeah. These are so expensive stuff and like you get everything. It's a cheat code really. Um I don't know how the how it works out for these companies. I guess not everybody is like us sitting and actually using these things and maybe even us we don't like how much a human can use. I I signed up for chat PRD. I used it once. It was good but I'm like okay I probably won't use it again. Maybe a few times maybe at best. But yeah, um it's really cool. Um I wish which one I wish granola. I love granola as well. Yeah, I wish replet wasn't in this like upper. I got it. I got it. I got it before it was I signed up to everything as soon as Yeah. You know, but we are uh like it's over this month. Like this is the last month we have it because we did it last year about this time. Yeah. But I have my suspicions that if you signed up to one of these right now, you still get the year. Yes, is in Oh, yes. That's true. That's true. Oh, I I didn't realize you were talking about Replet specifically, but Warp, they've changed their pricing and it's unlocked it again for me. So, what I'm going to do is resubscribe and then get another year of it. But I love Warp. I love Warp. I've made so much money off them. referral because I here's here's just an interesting just, you know, pull back the curtain a little bit about influencers and sponsorships and whatever. I genuinely love Warp and I you see it in my videos because I actually use it. I use it in every single video. And guess what? They get they get so I get so many referrals. I get every single day I get multiple referrals for this tool. It's because I genuinely love it. If you see me use a tool like they're the perfect sponsors, the the sponsors who I use in every single video. Fortunately, a lot of the sponsors I use in every single video probably don't need the sponsors yet, but Warp Yeah, they um Anyway, yeah, you you see mine. It's also my default. It's probably one of most used apps that I have. Uh we did talk about 3.5. We didn't we didn't speak too much about it because I'm not that up to speed on it, but yeah, we did. If you if you dart back about probably about 20 minutes before you joined to be honest, 20 minutes before I saw your first message come through, we spoke about it. Yeah. Cool. Anyway, so let's so introducing slots. Now, Figma supports slots. And if you don't know what they are, they are kind of a gamecher if you are building systems. If you are doing anything with components with Figma and you are trying to do like different versions of something, slots is what was missing and missing heavily. and I'm just so happy that they are here. I'm not super sure about the implementation, but we'll get into it. First, what is a slot? It allows you to have a component and within that component have a frame and allow other components to be nested inside of that frame. And not just one, you could have many components. So imagine you you have a list type of component. You don't have to decide how many items your component can have as like the designer or the user whoever that is can add as many as they need and the component grows you know with that if you have auto layout which you should have. Uh but yeah with slots you can have components within components. So, how does it work? Here we have this Figma slots playground tool uh which shows us how it works. Uh let's actually go directly to it. So here we have this build your own slot. It's just a simple frame. We turn it into a component. So we do this from here. Now this is a component. And now that it is a component, we add a frame inside of it. And once we add a frame, we can make this frame to be a slot. Yes, here. Convert to slot. We do this. Just leave it as is. Now, this is a slot. You see this is not perfect. I'm doing it on purpose. Uh, and now this slot can have other components in it. Uh, to do that, I need to duplicate the component. So I have not the master but like a version of that component. Now you see the the plus and here we can see what other components we have in the file and just pull them in. Now you see this is cutting up. It's not perfect because you know uh this has to be you know hugging and whatnot. You can actually do it from here. Hug content and hugging content. I'm doing something wrong here, I'm sure. Uh, what did I do to I I managed to do this correctly prior to the show, but now I'm missing something. I I confused myself. Anyway, doesn't matter. If you know how to use auto layout, you don't make this mistake. I'm not a, you know, designer designer. Uh but for those who use Figma um this is a game changer. So this is just like a quick uh preview. I haven't done I haven't spent too much time with it but I will after the show because how cool this is. And it will uh what what this does also it will decrease the number of components and especially like variations of the components. Um it it will decrease them by a lot because you don't have to have a different component variation for everything. You can just have a slot that can you know have other components in it. So you can create more with less. Uh there is also another thing that I want to mention. They they talked about it very briefly migrating components with slots. So apparently there is a way to migrate. Again I haven't been I haven't gotten through everything but yeah um that's something that you can do. What else did I have on my notes? Uh ah uh another thing that is pretty interesting. Let me find it. Okay. So, another thing that I found interesting here, you can have uh adding preferred instances. So, I guess you can have like suggested components that can be added to it. Again, I haven't played with that um a lot either. I found also another u playground that I will play with to wrap my hand my head around it. Uh for example, here we see it connected. Um and you see here you can choose the different uh components uh easily you can swap them. So yeah. So the actual slot itself can have a designated set of options. Is that what I just saw then? That that's what I think it is. Yes, that that's what I think it is. And we see it here. Yeah. Using slot swap the slot instance in Figma for a customized local component. So local component is what you have in this file and you can swap it. Um but again I have to spend more time with it here. I didn't maybe I didn't show this completely and properly because the auto layout I got it wrong but as you see you can have like different uh you can have different components here. Uh let me try to see if I can get this working. Ah maybe because this is not an outer layout. Yes, this should be an outer layout. hog content and this is also hogging content. Now we have like the uh we have the components and now within it we can have another component. So you see what I'm doing here I have the same component within the same component. Yeah I I I forgot to give this one auto layout that's why it's it wasn't working but yeah you can already see how nice this can be and how useful. Uh yeah, another one here just to show you can you can have this one. Yeah. Um things within things essentially the Yeah, I think this is like a perfect example of how it can be. You have a main component and you you put other things in it. Very cool. really really cool. I think um I wonder how these get rendered in because obviously they you can publish sites, Figma sites and things like that. I wonder if these all get these all work within Figma sites and you know um and the prototyping obviously all all work and the prototyping but yeah how it all um can actually come to a workable product and how this and similarly like using the MCP and things like how does this translate to something outside of Figma or is it just a quality of life Figma quality of life feature for Figma users which it is. So what is pretty interesting here uh when I'm in the dev mode um and I choose the I select the the parent here at least I don't see the slot but I see the slot here and the panel itself being inside this the slot. So if I click it, I see it. But just clicking the parent, I don't see it. And I wonder how it works. If I copy the prompt and like with this link uh because if I say explore component behavior, then it does show the entire thing that is you know kind of like within one another. Yeah. Um this is it's a good point. We I will I will try it and see uh something that I have to still wrap my head around exactly how it's done. I'm very familiar with it how it's done in web flow. In Webflow it is very simple. You you make a div. You use a div to make a slot and then you just drag any component that you want in it and that's pretty much it. And you can have that slot to be a flexbox or a grid or whatever that you want. Very cool. Very cool. Um, let's let's wrap this bad boy up with something slightly more serious, unfortunately. Um, have you kept up to date with what's going on with uh anthropic and the department of war? Yeah. So, I covered it last week and um to give you a quick rundown um Claude and Anthropic have been working with the Department of Defense which was rebranded to the Department of War and uh they've been working with them for quite a while. One of the first companies to actually work with the Department of War uh using the AI capabilities and and things like that. However, there were two major um restrictions on Claude for for a couple of different reasons that meant that uh Department of War couldn't use it to to you know for what it wanted to use it for. Those two things were uh mass surveillance, so civil mass surveillance and autonomous weaponry. And one of them is technical and one of them is moral. Like the the models aren't reliable enough to enable um autonomous weaponry. Plus, it kind of goes against the constitution of of um you know being a human in the loop of of making the decision whether a piece of weaponry should or should not kill you know someone. The mass surveillance thing is very obviously a moral stance. I mean, it's actually a very good use case for AIS to troll through trillions of terabytes of data uh and make sense of it all. So, those are things they wouldn't lift. And so the Department of War uh threatened Anthropic to to actually not only destroy their contracts between the Department of War and Anthropic, but also label them a supply chain risk, which is, you know, it's a step. It's quite it's quite far punitive to uh to to ruin anthropics relationships with anyone who is also working with the department of war to like just label them as a supply chain risk is is a step too far in many people's opinion. OpenAI then stepped in and took the contract within moments of um the original announcement that Anthropic gave which was that we will not be lifting these limits for the reasons I just said. Uh Sam Alman came in with it and it really did not land well. I think obviously people were siding here with Anthropic. Uh mostly for the probably the civilian aspect, the um the uh surveillance aspect of it. Um and then it just looked terrible. And I'll go into I'll go into Sam Alman's basically I feel like he's digging himself a massive hole here just trying to they're trying to claim that they're going to still uphold those things that Sam Alman is trying to lift this supply chain risk aspect and just I don't know it didn't not land well and he got kind of slated on Twitter doing an ask me anything and you know really didn't it's no and this supply chain thing is not small like from what I read about it like this this can destroy the company because there are so so many companies that are somehow related to well we'll get into that the government like doing something for the government this is pretty much everybody is okay okay so so yeah we'll talk about it but you're not wrong you're not wrong yeah um and there was a big movement off the back of this which was um the they so Claude even had to reduce its default capacity or default reasoning effort on its models. They had to shut off um another thing. I don't know what it was, but the point is they had such an influx of users. It became number one on the app store because people were leaving chat GPT because of this. They were it was literally a whatever you call it. And they made it easy by the way like Anthropic made it easy to migrate from Yes. They brought that feature, didn't they? They brought that memories feature to to move your memories. Very smart. Yeah. Very smart. So, they've really, you know, they're in a lot of people's good books right now, you know. Um, everything else aside, what you may or may not like, I I quite like Dario. I think he he seems like a very smart person. He left Open AI because of safety fe uh safety. They he wasn't convinced that Chat GPT had safety top of mind when it comes to um artificial intelligence. So, that's kind of where we're up to speed. Oh, and then I don't know if you heard, but war broke out. Well, I say war, that's a bit extreme, but um the Israel and and the US uh were bombing Iran. And um yeah, didn't didn't you know this, didn't you? Gosh. Gosh, you want to read the news. Um, yeah, and this was over the over the weekend. So, I I don't know what all kind of whether any kind of AI was used in all of this, but it's obviously war is is top of top of mind right now and open air at the front of it. Um, and this was a letter that got brought out yesterday, which was uh where things stand with the Department of War. This is where we're at right now. and they it was only a threat that they would be labeled a supply chain risk but now we have confirmation that they have actually been labeled a supply chain risk which the reason why I said to your what you were saying is is a big deal um they made a point um they they're challenging that's not legally sound so obviously they're going to they going to be taking this to court because the department of war are not a you know they are still bound by the laws of that govern the the country. They're not somehow escaping those laws. So this they will, you know, they they can take them to court. But the um here's what I was doing. It plainly imply applies only to use of chord by customers as direct part of contracts with the department of war. So I just wanted to clarify that it's it's through those direct contracts. So you can still have your quad code membership. But the point is I I don't think this is enough. I think people will contracts will cease because they just don't want to tread that line. Do you know what I mean? They don't want to accidentally use claude for a department of war thing because they don't want to have to chop and change between oh crap this is department of war thing. Got to shut down my clawed code and not have it running and this and that the other. I think people would just be like, "Look, let's just we'll just cancel our contract because this is too difficult to to tread." But yeah, so still allowed to have the contracts. They're just not to allowed to apply it to uh any contracts with the Department of War. So this is kind I mean, this is where we're kind of at. Um I'm just reading through it now. Um basically harpering on about the this this um thing. Oh, there was a leaked email as well, which I didn't see, but there was an apology here about a leaked email somewhere. Um, that was not it was it was a draft email that got leaked, so it never actually got sent or something like this. But the the president has really been um as he does uh has been very uh egging on the whole thing and and and uh fueling the fire, you know, because he Trump very revengeful and uh very much at the um forefront of any kind of friction, any kind of like uh yeah, he he war and business deals all Trump Trump lives for. So that's kind of where we're at right now. And um with obviously the the the maybe it's not fair to say a war has broken out, but certainly some heated uh friction going on in uh in Iran. We're probably going to hear more and more and yeah uh they have used we know that they have used uh clot for Maduro for capturing Maduro in Venezuela. Okay. And another thing is I I don't know where I read but I read that they are still using claude which I'm not sure about like if they are I think there's a six month windoff thing or something maybe that would be also interesting to see if they can actually because like clot is really good and like yes in many tests it's like slightly better but somehow when you when you use both, you know, it's just it's just better. Uh so I don't know how they can deal with that and it's really bad looks for open AI and Sam Alman. I mean we have been at at these like myself have been siding more like more often with Claude and Anthropic in general uh than you know with with open AI and we know that like Theo you know he he's more on the open AI side in this one really hard yeah I know he in this instance he made a video on But still, I feel like he still kind of was like, "Yeah, Sam is coming from like some of this is coming from a good heart and he's trying to do something." I I I don't know. I don't think it's coming from a good I think it is purely opportunistic. Yeah. uh OpenAI saw this as an opportunity uh to take a big big contract and if they have a chance to create a a monopoly I I I think they will take that chance and uh I'm glad so on brand for Sam yeah it is and I'm glad that Claude is now number one in app store and I think more people should install it because it's genuinely better it is like in so many ways genu The only reason I'm using codeex, it's because it's essentially free. Yeah. Not because it's better. Yeah. Yeah. Well, don't don't rule out GBC 5.4, you know, but I think um Yeah. I think that maybe Theo is a bit a little bit I I think he's very biased actually at times, but uh he um he likes the coding. He likes the code. He likes the dev side of um Open. And he's he's met Sam and Sam and him are buddy buddies. and this and that, but I honestly I get really bad vibes off of Sam. Yeah, you know, yeah, I wanted to say exactly the same. He's very much like Mark Zuckerberg. I'm not saying Dario is savior of us and you know for democracy or whatever but I I do genuinely think they they are trying better and their product in many cases is better. So yeah that's that. Yeah. So, I'm keeping an eye on this uh how this progresses, but it's um yeah, it's yeah, it'll be really really interesting to see how it'll be a true test of whether Chad GBT or Open AI can even, you know, I I would not be surprised in three months they say, "Look, it's just not it's just not good enough. We can't Let's see uh if Chipdatah Yeah. Yeah. Oh, well, there we go. Wrap it up there. Yeah. Cool. Well, oh, I did want to ask one thing. So, we didn't do our coding thing on Wednesday, did we? No. Yeah. So, what we what what Kaza and I have been doing has just been doing some agentic coding on Wednesdays and I've been imparting what I know onto onto you and and whatever. And I think it's just interesting to see coding in the flesh. if you want to like let us know in this video and in and whatever. Leave a comment and we will read it. But let us know what you want us to explore as as actually doing code or or what you want to see, what you're stuck on, what you're interested in. Um because it they are quite cool those IRL stream of actual coding, you know, none of this editing, none of this oneshot magic, just let's build something. what what problems do we encounter and how do we resolve them um in real life? So yeah, let us know. Um OpenAI just dropped codec security. Interesting. Interesting. Um cool. Let's wrap it up. Now that we want to wrap it up, uh there is Yeah. Cool. Well, that's all we got time for. Make sure you give us a like. We've got a domain name now, commandi show.com, cmdai, uh, which will just link through to our YouTube to be fair. So, go visit that. Give us a subscribe on there. Give us a like on this video wherever you're watching, Twitter, Twitch, or YouTube. Um, and that's it. Join us next week for all the news and AI design and dev. I've been Sam and I've been Kaba. Keep.