Gemini three launched last week and its design capabilities are phenomenal - but for general purpose, for research, for just chatting with it, it's so good I just don't understand.
I don't think the normal person needs much better than that - we're splitting hairs at this point for general purpose AI. Gemini three lacked on the coding side, but Claude is amazing at coding with Opus 4.5.
The real question is: do we now need AIs to go really deep on certain tasks? Are we going to stop looking for AIs that do it all and start being like, "I need a writing AI - what's the best AI for that?"
Let me know down in the comments whether you believe that these general purpose models are kind of like they're done and we're going to be looking for better AIs that do really well at one thing.
—
TIMESTAMPS:
0:00 - The Gemini 3 Reality Check
0:26 - Why General Purpose AI is "Good Enough"
0:52 - The Specialization Trend Begins
1:35 - Are We Done with "Do It All" AI? 🛑
2:09 - What is "CMD + AI"?
—
Unlock the full potential of your online presence with Kabarza and Samuel—experts in web design and development (respectively), powered by cutting-edge AI solutions. We blend creative design with advanced tech to deliver smart, high-impact websites that stand out. Ready to elevate your business? Contact us today and see what AI-driven innovation can do for you!
LINKS & RESOURCES:
Check out Kabarza's amazing work: https://kabarza.com
Visit Samuel's website for more: https://samuelgregory.co.uk
📷 Follow on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/cmdaishow
—
HASHTAGS:
#GeneralPurposeAI #Gemini3 #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #ChatGPT #Claude #Opus45 #AISpecialization #FutureOfAI
Transcript
Gemini 3 launched last week which is fantastic multimodel. Its design capabilities are phenomenal. Check out our other videos as we went through anti-gravity and replet and things like that. Um the design capabilities are really good but for general purpose for research for you using like just inference just chatting with it. It's so good. I just don't understand like I don't think the normal person needs much better than that. I think GBT kind of was is there as well. They're kind you're splitting hairs at this point for general purpose AI. As I said, they did they lacked on the coding and so then Claude is amazing at coding really really good at coding. Pe some people use it for writing. I think it's lost its edge a little bit on the writing side because GBT is more familiar whereas I feel like Gem Gemma 3 is more well research but oh by the way when I say familiar I mean it's sort of down to earth. It's a bit more friendly. Um it's a bit more pedestrian if that makes sense. It's just a bit more casual. When I say general purpose, what I mean is like Gemma 3 is good enough for for just, you know, using chat and whatever. Do we now need AIs to go really deep on certain tasks so we'll get like a maths or a science research AI that one of these companies comes out with? Probably going to be Google because I think they're already doing it. But are we going to stop looking for these AIs that just do it all and start being like, "Well, I need a writing AI. What's the best AI for that?" I don't know. Let me know down in the comments whether you believe that these general purpose models are kind of like they're done. not really much need not really much need to get better and we're going to be looking for better AIs that do really well at one thing such as Opus 4.5 or Claude in general um is just amazing at coding and people will start to look um elsewhere for for other things. This is part of a larger conversation on my show Command AI which we stream live every single week. We discuss the news and all things related to AI in the world of design and web. Catch us next week and join in the banter.
Cmd+ AI